tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207419840334401858.post4110497857689863175..comments2023-10-25T03:41:35.987-04:00Comments on Romish Popery: Anglican OrdersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207419840334401858.post-67257446024313646032009-08-01T11:46:41.179-04:002009-08-01T11:46:41.179-04:00This, of course, is completely true. Unfortunatel...This, of course, is completely true. Unfortunately, there really are people who question or flat out deny the validity of the Ordinary Form of the Mass. It has been suggested by some (take for instance <a href="http://wdtprs.com/blog/2009/07/quaeritur-reserving-two-ciboria-for-tlm-and-for-novus-ordo/" rel="nofollow">this link</a> from Fr. Z's blog) that a two-ciboria option might be a Chadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08374170352983040015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207419840334401858.post-35317352407935100752009-08-01T09:22:59.868-04:002009-08-01T09:22:59.868-04:00It's not my understanding that anything needs ...It's not my understanding that anything needs to be "hammered out". The Ordinary Form of the Mass is just that - ordinary, and valid. There is no reason to use separate tabernacles/ciboria etc. for Hosts consecrated at the different forms of the Mass.Dannoreply@blogger.com